#Teleprompter for zoom plus#
#Teleprompter for zoom tv#

House nailed a two-leg parlay on the Falcons-Panthers game and an impressive underdog moneyline parlay on the Packers and Browns.īut there were formatting stumbles. The personalities generally meshed well, and the bets touted by the hosts had a decent hit rate (which would have been much higher had they not had so much love for the Steelers getting 2.5 against San Francisco). In the producers’ defense, though, a little “Preseason Week 3” is bound to show up in most teams’ Week 1 performance. On at least two occasions, the onscreen odds were incorrect.

#Teleprompter for zoom plus#

There were awkward Zoom delays and the related talking-over-each-other moments, plus some freezing video on House’s end and even him briefly dropping off the call. The first episode, unfortunately, was plagued by technical issues that made it feel more like an internet-level than a TV-level production. There’s a FanDuel odds ticker on the bottom third throughout the show, resembling the approach of such programs as the late Lock It In and ESPN’s Daily Wager. The show partners Iacono with three voices familiar to Ringer podcast listeners: host John Jastremski, Bill Simmons’ college buddy Joe House, and former Action Network analyst Raheem Palmer. Ringer Wise Guys, meanwhile, enters a crowded and competitive space, battling for eyeballs on Sunday morning against not only the various major-network NFL pregame shows but also the ever-growing list of online livestreams from purveyors of betting and DFS advice. It’s safe to say he’s better utilized conversing with co-hosts and guests than monologuing to the audience.

#Teleprompter for zoom tv#

Cheese” after the Lions coach made a couple of high-risk fourth-down decisions in Thursday night’s season opener.ĭespite having accumulated plenty of TV experience - he was a talking-head fixture for several years on FOX’s Lock It In - Iacono came off fairly stiff as he read the teleprompter the first few minutes of the show. The best line of the first episode was Iacono declaring Dan Campbell “ballsier than the pit at Chuck E.

It’s fairly similar to Iacono’s podcast work, as this episode includes a lengthy pick-focused conversation with Cousin Sal’s buddy Harry Gagnon (part of the “Degenerate Trifecta” that joins him on every episode of the Against All Odds podcast), an interview with sports betting great Billy Walters, and some scripted Iacono rants and bits. How wise, how winning?Ĭousin Sal’s Winning Weekend is also available as an audio podcast and clocked in at 48 minutes for Friday’s episode, while just the first 12 minutes of the video version are available on The Ringer’s site. The general takeaway: There’s plenty of potential here, but it was Week 1 and with that came undeniable rust to shake off. So on Friday morning, FanDuel TV debuted Cousin Sal’s Winning Weekend, an NFL and college football betting preview show recorded the night before, and Sunday morning saw the premiere of Ringer Wise Guys, a live-streaming NFL countdown show.

But as FanDuel announced heading into this football season, he’s now back in the fold at The Ringer, which has long had an advertising partnership with FanDuel. Iacono began hosting a sports betting podcast for The Ringer in 2017 and took his show to his own newly launched podcast network in 2020. “Cousin Sal” (Jimmy Kimmel’s cousin and a longtime writer on his late-night show).

Overreacting to Week 1 is an inevitable part of the annual football fan/pundit experience.Īnd just as it was ill-advised to write off the 49ers when they lost in rainy Chicago to open the 2022 season or to pencil in the Bucs for another Super Bowl run after they trounced the Cowboys that night, it’s probably unfair to judge a new sports betting-focused TV show based on its premiere episode.įanDuel TV debuted not one but two shows this weekend featuring Sal Iacono, a.k.a. It’s a tried-and-true NFL tradition, taking the results of just one game - often featuring star players who sat out the preseason and have some rust to shake off - and overhyping the winners while underrating the losers.